Are We Ready for Web 2.0?
By now, you’ve probably heard of the latest browser craze known as Flock. I call it a craze, and really it is just that; the hype for this browser came when it was announced and long before there was any code or builds to view. It seems that this kind of hype occurs all too often these days, and I even find myself wrapped up in it occasionally. And why not? It feels good to know that the industry wheels are churning again, that there’s money in the air—or, at least, the hint of it, anyway.
But is there anything to this hype? Is there anything to Flock, to Web 2.0, to AJAX, to blogging, podcasting, tagging? Truthfully, I think the jury’s still out on this. Indeed, beyond the nifty buzzword, I see what Web 2.0 promises. It represents a mounting paradigm shift in the way we view and treat information…but I think it’s way ahead of its time.
Web 2.0, as I understand it, not only embodies the Web as a platform, but it philosophically seems to represent an opening up of information and the free share and exchange of ideas. This almost smacks of Gene Roddenberry’s futuristic vision of Star Trek: The Next Generation. I’m not sure that we’re culturally ready for such an open—some might say “Socialistic”—approach to information.
The governments of our world are undergoing tremendous growing pains at this point in history with regard to information and intellectual property. On the one hand, we see the traditionalists and the corporations who wish to maintain a firm grasp on IP, copyright, and patents. Why shouldn’t they? These modes of protection have brought them to where they are and have made them very profitable. On the other hand are the neo-copyrightists who philosophically advocate for open information and free exchange of ideas. In the middle is a government trying to appease both sides, but, more often than not, the traditionalists have the money and, thus, the power of influence.
Can the ideals of Web 2.0 survive in this environment? I think the technology is definitely there. We can create extremely usable Web sites for the masses, and more and more, people are buying computers primarily for the business of being online—and not because of software. Indeed, the software is now online for many things, and the computer is a client to reach it. Yet, therein lies the problem: information is everywhere. Technology is forcing us to rethink our traditional approaches to information and IP. Traditionally, he who holds the information wields the most power and control. With Web 2.0, everyone collectively holds the information.
So, I followed along that lengthy tangent to come back to this: is Web 2.0 just early 21st century marketing hype, and is Flock simply riding the craze? Or could Web 2.0 represent a growing shift in cultural values—on a global scale?
There’s no doubt that Flock, at this point, is merely riding the Web 2.0 wave. After all, it’s really just Firefox with some added features that don’t particularly impress me. We’ll just have to wait and see what comes of it as it moves beyond the “Developer Preview” stages into alpha and beta versions.
As for Web 2.0, only time will tell whether it represents real social change or just good marketing.
For more on Flock, read Jim Rapoza’s “Flock Can’t Fly Yet” blog post.
3 Comments
Full Ack Ben.
Flock is just another step in a new Browserwar. Why implement such features in a browser? On my (current) point of view all those "WEB 2.0" features should just be implemnted on the Webapplication side. Its only the job of the developers, merge all the technologies laying in front of us for serval month (years?) in an intuitive useable an reliable way.
Also i think that we have much features of WEB2.0 *buzzzzzz* already, but not intuitive and not geared together.
I guess the main thing is that the applications support standards like webservices(soap/xmlrpc/rest) continuous and make use of some kind of "social patterns" so it would be intuitive to the user. With the support of well known standards nearly everything ist possible and integrateable by every who wants.
If someone thinks im wrong dont hesitate to correct me,
-
Hmm i think this is my longest comment in a weblog ever :).
Greeting from germany
At first - yes - Flock is certainly hyped but it also presents interestings thoughts. I am sure that Flock serves a purpose in the "Web 2.0 revolution". Flock says: "Hey - the web is going through a change - maybe we should think about that when we do our browsers" - it will make people think that yeah - maybe we should include web 2.0 functionality into our browsers and if Flock can make people think those thoughts then Flock has served its purpose. Its like the green party here in Sweden. Before it was voted into our parliament not much attention was paid to the envrioment issues. Now they are in the parliament but haven't got many votes - they have however served their purpose because now every party in the swedish parliament pays attention to the enviroment.
Is web 2.0 a ciltural revolution? Yes I think so. The power is transfered from the big companies into the hands of everybody. Today you do not have to be rich to make an impakt - you just have to do something good. People also know that if they do something and gives it away for free they will get somehting for free and thats a big revolution - we can get rid of the gready people because if you are gready you get less in some sort of way.
This is as you say kind of a liberalistic/socialistic revolution. The power is transfered to us - the people. Its great. You do however have some very good points which I think I will discuss further on my blog later - I don't have time now.
Just wait till these features are implemented in MSIE. Everyone will have a blog at msn.com, use microsoft-style annotation, etc. Jump for joy, anyone?